Understanding my Approach to U.S. Politics
From time to time I feel the need to engage the political process or share information via social media such as Twitter or Facebook. What seems to be innocuous engagement often turns into something quite different and often has undesirable results. Much of this can be attributed to the not-really-designed for dialogue medium of social media and the internet. Most of these conversations get off track because of misunderstanding. I understand we all have different opinions and that some of the disagreement stems from the way that we have experienced the world. That’s essentially a human characteristic – we are all remarkably diverse, and it’s something we all need to accept.
The troubling part of these social media political conversations is when people attribute to me (or anyone else for that matter) a whole set of intentions and/or affiliations based on faulty assumptions (You know what they say about assumptions). There is a big difference between a fact and opinion that a person states and their rationale for stating it or their position regarding the matter.
For example – because I am a Christian I have a foundational commitment to biblical compassion and justice. I may relate a troubling fact about the growing gap between the rich & the poor (which includes the disappearing middle class). This means I think that this is a problem & that is why I am communicating it. Research shows the fact to be true. I post it because I want others to know about it and hear opinions as to what can be done about it. This is all within the realm of dialogue. Now – because I am stating something about the rich & the poor does not necessarily mean that I am engaging in class warfare, that I support occupy Wall Street, that I desire an “entitlement” state, that I am a socialist or communist, or (derogatorily) that I am liberal. The same can be applied to any number of what people consider, for some reason, “issues of the left” such as welfare, education, the environment, or any political candidate who is a Democrat. I see these as “country issues” that are not the province of one party/perspective. Another example – because I am a Christian I care about marriages and relationships. Divorce rates and issues facing families concern me as problematic. I post it because I want to share it and want others to know about it & work towards solutions. This does not mean I am endorsing any political action group or set of laws regarding marriage and family or advocating a particular “issue of the right.”
The same approach is consistently applied to my thoughts on other issues such as the national debt, individual responsibility, limitation of the federal government, church & state separation, or military action; my discussion of these issues doesn’t mean I am (derogatorily) conservative. I see this as a “societal issue” that affects all of us. The problem with assumptions is they are judgments not based on fact but based on fear or its sibling anger. This usually leads to labeling, name calling, & the breakdown of relationship. All of these are addressed in the New Testament as sin, because God cares about the unity (& diversity) in the body of Christ. My allegiance in life is to no other name than Jesus Christ.
In an effort to increase understanding, so that Christ may be glorified, I am posting this note so people know my positions and approach to politics – specifically why I refuse to chose a party or be a one issue voter. If I feel that communication is devolving, I will refer people to this statement. I realize that people may disagree with my principles and that is fine. However, they will clearly know where I stand and why I take that stance. I hope this invites clearer communication & worthwhile discourse.
(1) I am a Christian who lives in a democracy. As such, my main concern is the Church not the State. I believe that both the far right & far left make the mistake of trying to make the State the Church – and thus try to legislate based on a faulty assumption. America may have been founded by some Christians (but not all were) – but they clearly established a democratic-republic, not a Christian nation. Jews, Muslims, all-other religions and atheists are welcome as full-fledged Americans. This is the vision of the founders. This, however, does not mean that Christians have no say in government. The say that we do have should be what promotes “justice for all.” The Christian role in government should be the “common good” & for equality in individual liberties. When we try to make the State fill the role of the Church we weaken both entities and disfigure them beyond recognition.
(2) As a Christian, I do not have the liberty of speaking of or treating any group of people with degrading or dehumanizing statements or attitudes. This often comes in the form of sweeping stereotypes such as: All rich people are greedy. All poor people are not lazy. Fiscal responsibility is a matter of justice just as is rightly conceived welfare assistance that lends a hand to the “least of these.” I believe in giving people the benefit of the doubt & also giving them grace. I believe there are good Democrats & bad Democrats, good Republicans and bad Republicans. I believe there are other political perspectives that have things to teach us but aren’t legitimized as major political parties. I have friends across the political spectrum – and I appreciate that & try to learn from them. Frankly, I care more about our unity in Christ (for the Christians) and who they are as people (for everyone). Most of all – no one person or party has cornered the market on Christianity. That is why I am not a one issue voter. This is also why I choose to be a political Independent. Ronal Reagan said – if we agree on 80% of things that doesn’t mean you’re my enemy – it means you’re my ally. I think most Americans agree on most things. Most Americans want real solutions from a good government but not an intrusive one.
(3) I am a Christian who believes that God calls us to worship him with our mind, meaning we should use it. As a Wesleyan, I use the tools of Scripture, tradition, reason, and experience. Sweeping generalizations and over-simplifications of complex issues are problematic for someone such as myself, who can see value in multiple perspectives and who knows the danger of reductionism. Also, this means that I believe that science is a helpful tool in getting to the truth about things. Emotions are a part of who we are but they should be the last thing we consider because they don’t tell us much other than when we feel threatened or secure. Basing opinions on emotions, or only on anecdotal experience, is not a thoughtful way to care for the common good or for oneself. Trying to examine & think through issues often leaves me seeing the value of both sides of an argument. I’m often left searching for a middle or better option than extremes on the table. For example – I believe that education is foundational for civil liberty and I generally believe it’s underfunded (teacher pay mostly). However, I also believe there is a lot of waste and poor policy regarding education and it needs real reform. I can’t throw the baby out with the bathwater – I don’t think that is the only choice. Furthermore, we must all examine our thoughts to see if they are LOGICALLY CONSISTENT. Many times people hold contradictory beliefs (like upholding Ayn Rand’s nihilistic individualism & Christianity) OR they refuse to apply their critique of one party’s policies to their OWN party (like being upset with “Big Government” when it’s the Democrats but not applying that critique the Republican governmental power overreach). If you are going to hold a position – you must HOLD IT EQUALLY across the board or admit that you really don’t hold said position, rather, you just wish to use it to label your political opponents. We can’t have our cake and eat it too.
(4) As a Christian, I recognize the Bible takes social justice & systemic evil very seriously – as it does personal evil & poor choices. The world is not fair & the deck is stacked against the powerless in favor of the powerful. This is recognition of how extensive and communal sin actually is – it’s the way of the sinful world. However, we are persons within a sinful world & we are culpable. The Bible also teaches us that part of being human means the ability to choose, to take responsibility for one’s life. God gives us an alternative community for healing – the Church. Our past need not determine our future; we can be transformed in Christ. My ultimate dream is that we serve one another in love, equipping and empowering one another to be the whole person in Christ. The government can have a role in ensuring the fairest playing field possible, but it cannot force people to be responsible and must be wary of the dangers of enabling irresponsibility (in rich & poor) people.
(5) Finally, I believe that absolute power corrupts absolutely – so as a Christian I believe in the biblical idea of accountability. No person can combat the temptations of power without the aid of others. I think the wisdom of our founders is seen in the fact they established a government with a balance of power, one with three branches of power. I realize that government itself is powerful. A government that is not accountable to its people is in danger of abusing that power. Voters get to hold the government accountable. Government needs to be transparent, and in some cases like taxation this means it must be clearer in order to be more accountable to the people. I also realize that Jesus named “Mammon” as the main false god. All power of this world follows money. Money is the leader, the influencer. Those who govern need money to get elected & money to govern. It’s intoxicating. The source of money – business – must also be addressed. I believe in the value of law & regulation for the purpose of keeping business accountable to the people of a nation. Just because we could make more money unlawfully does not mean that we should – because we all, business included, pay for it in the end (see Great Depression & 2006/7 bubble burst). Good laws can aid the common good and each individual citizen. I don’t believe that government or business are “evil” – they can be – but as such, neither of them are “bad” in and of themselves; moreover, each is capable of great good.
These are the essential premises that go through my mind as a Christian who happens also to be a citizen of the great United States of America. If you want to understand what I say politically without assuming and without judgment, I have summarized the intent of my heart & mind here. If you disagree with these things, you are free to do so, but I will likely ask you to give good reason why. I will expect a good answer, based on consistent thought (for Christians – based on your theological worldview) because I believe we’re all capable of it if we try (and because I believe that God expects us to “reason” through things, not just “feel” them). I don’t mean to offend you if I press you for more reasoning. Most of the time, I’m trying to understand why you feel as you do. Sometimes I disagree and am trying to understand how you could feel the way you feel. The bottom line in is that I am seeking understanding. My first step has been to clarify my own reasoning for you. My second step is to give you a fair hearing & seek understanding your perspective. If we still disagree, then I believe we will be able to do so with civility. I will not seek to demean or degrade you or judge you as inferior simply for having a different opinion than my own. Finally, I will always continue to stay in relationship with you because I believe you’re a dearly beloved child of God & I care most about God’s Kingdom & the blessed life offered to all.
Grace and Peace,
Jason